On Monday, IEA Executive Director Fatih Birol delivered the starkest assessment yet of the current energy crisis. Speaking in Canberra, he said the global economy faces a "major, major threat" from the war's disruption to oil and gas flows and that "no country will be immune." He then offered the comparison that stopped markets: the current situation, he said, is worse than the combined oil crises of 1973 and 1979, which together lost 10 million barrels per day. "And today, only as of today, we lost 11 million barrels per day — so more than two major oil shocks put together."
Most people have heard of the 1973 oil crisis. Far fewer understand what it actually did to the American economy — or why Birol's comparison is so significant.
What the 1973 and 1979 Crises Actually Did
The 1973 Arab oil embargo cut global supply by approximately 4–5 million barrels per day and lasted roughly five months. It triggered a quadrupling of oil prices, a U.S. recession, double-digit inflation, and the longest gasoline lines in American history. The experience fundamentally reshaped U.S. energy policy, created the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, and established the IEA itself as a crisis-response institution.
The 1979 Iranian Revolution removed approximately 5–6 million barrels per day from global supply for an extended period. It contributed to a second wave of inflation, a severe recession in 1980–82, and interest rates that reached 20% as the Federal Reserve tried to break the inflationary spiral.
Combined, those two crises represent the worst peacetime energy disruption the modern global economy has experienced. Birol is saying the current disruption exceeds them both — not sequentially, but simultaneously, right now.
Why the U.S. Is More Insulated Than in 1973 — But Not Immune
There are meaningful differences between now and 1973 that provide the U.S. with buffers that did not exist then. The U.S. produces approximately 13.6 million barrels per day domestically — it was a net importer in 1973 with minimal domestic production. The Strategic Petroleum Reserve holds roughly 350 million barrels. The shale revolution has diversified global supply away from total Middle East dependence.
These buffers mean the U.S. will not experience 1973-style gasoline lines. They do not mean the U.S. is unaffected. They mean the U.S. is less affected than in 1973, while still experiencing the largest single-year household energy cost increase since that period. At $3.94/gallon nationally and rising, the math is already visible on every receipt.
The 40 Energy Facilities Statistic
Birol also noted that at least 40 energy facilities across nine countries have been severely damaged in the conflict. This is a number that has received almost no attention relative to its significance. Refineries, LNG terminals, and oil ports take months to years to fully repair and restore capacity. Even if Hormuz reopens tomorrow, the supply infrastructure to process and move that oil through the system has been partially dismantled. Full price normalization will lag a Hormuz reopening by a meaningful period — likely 3–6 months minimum.
What This Means for Your Gas Price
The IEA's warning translates to one practical conclusion: even in the best-case scenario — Hormuz reopens, coalition escorts begin, Iran stands down — do not expect gas prices to return to $2.83 quickly. The infrastructure damage, the insurance rate increases that have been baked in, the supply chain disruptions that have rippled through every connected industry — these are sticky. A realistic post-resolution gas price floor is $3.10–3.30, not $2.83.
The question is no longer whether prices went up. It is how long they stay elevated after resolution — and what the political and economic consequences of that persistence are.
Subscribe below for the weekly update every Thursday.
— K. Lorraine, The Hormuz Effect
Sources: IEA Executive Director Fatih Birol statement (March 23, 2026) via NPR · EIA Short-Term Energy Outlook (March 10, 2026) · AAA Fuel Gauge Report (March 23, 2026) · IEA Oil Market Report (March 12, 2026)
The Hormuz Effect is an independent newsletter produced for informational purposes only. Nothing in this publication constitutes financial, investment, legal, or political advice. All content reflects the analysis and opinions of the author based on publicly available information and is subject to change without notice. Price projections, forecasts, and scenario analyses are estimates only and are not guaranteed to be accurate or to reflect future market conditions. The Hormuz Effect is not affiliated with any political party, candidate, political action committee, or government agency, and does not endorse any candidate, party, or policy position. References to third-party sources, data providers, apps, or financial products are for informational purposes only and do not constitute endorsements or recommendations. Readers should verify all information independently and consult a qualified financial, legal, or energy professional before making any decisions based on content published here. © 2026 The Hormuz Effect. All rights reserved.